Mike Piazza – Fansmanship http://www.fansmanship.com For the fans by the fans Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:58:36 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.28 For the fans by the fans Mike Piazza – Fansmanship fansmanship.com For the fans by the fans Mike Piazza – Fansmanship http://www.fansmanship.com/wp-content/uploads/powerpress/Favicon1400x1400-1.jpg http://www.fansmanship.com San Luis Obispo, CA Weekly-ish Pedro gets in, Piazza still on the outside http://www.fansmanship.com/pedro-gets-in-piazza-still-on-the-outside/ http://www.fansmanship.com/pedro-gets-in-piazza-still-on-the-outside/#comments Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:09:09 +0000 http://www.fansmanship.com/?p=16248 On the day the BBWAA announced their hall of famers, two former Dodgers were discussed prominently. First, Pedro Martinez got in. The younger brother of the Dodgers’ Ramon, Pedro was a dominant whirling dervish who helped the Red Sox snap their curse. His numbers are insane. The Dodgers 1990’s mediocrity cannot be traced to any one […]]]>

On the day the BBWAA announced their hall of famers, two former Dodgers were discussed prominently.

First, Pedro Martinez got in. The younger brother of the Dodgers’ Ramon, Pedro was a dominant whirling dervish who helped the Red Sox snap their curse. His numbers are insane. The Dodgers 1990’s mediocrity cannot be traced to any one transaction, but trading Pedro for Delino Deshields still stings.

Unlike Martinez, Mike Piazza did not get his 75 percent necessary, though he did get a little bit closer for the second consecutive year. Piazza, who is arguably the greatest hitting catcher of all-time, should get in sometime in the next two seasons if the trend continues. He was a star for the team when they didn’t really have one. His departure in 1998 coupled with the Kevin Brown signing that same year illustrated the type of team the Dodgers became for a number of years. Between 1998 and 2007 — a span of 10 years — the Dodgers won the National League West just once, made the playoffs twice, and won only one Jose Lima-fueled playoff game.

In general, I think I’ll always have two issues with the Hall of Fame voting:

1) Is he or isn’t he?

I could see a guy’s percentage changing over time, but to me, guys are either Hall of Fame material or not. Mike Piazza is a Hall of Famer. He will be a Hall of Famer. Why wait to vote for him? Will his numbers change? Will he make some kind of impact on you on the field? Of course he won’t. But he will get into the Hall of Fame. Eventually. Deservedly.

2) First ballot snubs

Were there really people who thought Randy Johnson and Pedro Martinez didn’t deserve to be in the Hall of Fame? Johnson got 97 percent of the vote and Pedro 91 percent. There is never a unanimous vote. I guess this is an extension of the first point, but for people who “hold-out” despite having all the knowledge they do as baseball writers, I ask, “Why?”

To withhold your vote the first year on principal and vote the following year for a guy is one of the silliest things ever. I definitely don’t ever understand a guy changing his vote on the 9th or 10th ballot… .

Along with Martinez and Johnson, the BBWAA members selected John Smoltz and Craig Biggio. All are totally worthy candidates.

Enough has been written for now about whether to allow players with steroids hanging over their heads into the Hall. For what it’s worth, the Internet Baseball Writers Association of America (of which I am a member) voted to enshrine Craig Biggio and Piazza last year, which kind of makes my point. Both are Hall of Famers. Both will eventually be in Cooperstown. It’s just a matter of time.

I just hope Piazza doesn’t do something silly, like wear a Mets hat.

]]>
http://www.fansmanship.com/pedro-gets-in-piazza-still-on-the-outside/feed/ 2
A Fringe Fan Muses http://www.fansmanship.com/a-fringe-fan-muses/ http://www.fansmanship.com/a-fringe-fan-muses/#comments Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:57:49 +0000 http://www.fansmanship.com/?p=1457 Far too often I find myself on the fringe of things, with the whos, whats, whens, and wheres fading fast into oblivious cyberspace. Musing over things of nothingness–the “why do I care about this?” sort of topics, excite me. Life’s biggest questions are answered from places you would least expect them. From the passing vagabonds, the angry poets, to the washed up, pot smelling one-legged surfers, still dancing to the Beach Boys in a speedo and a pair of flaring pink flip flops. Which is why the news like Man-Ram to Tampa is like pouring gasoline in my throat and lighting it with a birthday candle. I’d rather chew on some Teletubbies and drink a bit of Raffi, then I would watch the hyperbolic-tall tellers on SportsCenter digest, regurgitate, digest, shit, then digest the world of a pre-fabbed media outlet.

As I stare off tonight, starry eyed–ala Joey “Blue Sky” Harrington–into the planetary space of the abnormal, my wife is faithfully paying the bills and deciding whom to socially network with this week.  She is the planning operator, the assassin, the Nancy Kerrigan of the union. I, on the other hand, am a self-confessed Tonya Harding.

My only form of social networking is spinning over a few cold ones in a rundown pub–talking with middle-aged, divorced, unemployed conspiracists. They usually view professional baseball as a relative to marriage–systematically dead and broken, absorbed in its winner, less in its faceless building blocks. “Every winner needs a loser,” these men mutter, with overgrown hair hitting their eyelashes.

“Pre or post 18 Britney?” I ask to change the subject, counting the freckles on my left arm. My father called them war wounds in the womb. “Damn right,” I think (thirteen to be exact) turning one eye toward the TV, where an ESPN announcer blankly spits on my beloved Angels for overpaying  a thirty-two-year-old loser from Toronto. I always liked Vernon Wells… just not for eighty six million over the next four.

The pause is timely, allowing our intoxicated minds to find meaning in the topic at hand. “Pre” he says, slamming the frothing stout on the greasy bar top, with a Reagan-like head nod.  A belly the size of a ten pound bag of potatoes with black fuzz and poor complexion smiles from the creased top of his pants.

“Pre…nah,” I say shaking my dog mane hair, stepping a bit back,  examining him closer…world spinning.

“Another on me,” he slurs, pointing to the empty glasses glimmering in the dim-lit bar.

I like the whacked out Spears, like a rock conniseurewould like the Beatles drug induced psychedelic jams. Things need to be frayed, in disharmony, boundless, outside the box. Not collected, perfect, take home to your mother kind of stuff.

When I decided on the California Angels in 1987, I was five, and they were losing a game to the Minnesota Twins 21-1. Chuck Finley, who had pitched the day before, had to spell the Angels’ final relief pitcher in the 6th inning. My father was a fan of Wally Joyner, but growled with disapproval at my penitence of faith in arguably the worst franchise in league history. He had raised me on the greats of his generation: Mickey Mantle, Willie Mays, and Sandy Koufax. His interlink between coach and fatherhood ransacked my father’s ability to see clearly when it came to giving his growing son real advice (he once told me marriage is like hanging yourself by your nads). But in this instance, learning the hard way was learning the best way of all. My father saw this, and went with it. “Oh yea…” he said, chopping some hash on his lap,”better get used to the pain of losing, then.” And I did.

My marriage to the California/Anaheim/Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim is now in its twenty-fourth year of union. For seventeen of those I got used to losing and being the laughing stock of any sports or barbecue gathering. Most of my friends growing up were die hard Giants or Dodger fans. They idolized popular names like Barry Bonds, Orel Hershiser, Francisco Valenzuela, Matt Williams, Will Clark, and Mike Piazza. In 1988, the Dodgers won a World Series, and in 1989, the Giants played in the famous earthquake series against the A’s. Loving the Angels was like dating their ugly adopted sister. Which is why to this day I can still hear the faint laughter of my friends chewing on a dripping piece of tri-tip.

I knew growing up that the Angels would finish dead last in the division nine times out of ten. So losing took on a meaningful life of its own. Each “L” accrued night in, night out, gave me a sense of pride that I, unlike so many of my friends, could be true to an organization no matter how bad they were (yes I am speaking to you Clipper fans). I idolized Wally Joyner–“Wally World”–the 1986 American League Rookie of the Year. Had it not been for various injuries, the lifetime .289 hitter with 204 home runs and 2,060 hits, would have landed himself in the baseball Hall of Fame. But like  “Wally World” was a rust riddled park in Chase’s famed “Family Vacation,”  so was Joyner’s body. It did as an Angel should do: fall apart.

Which reminds me of our famous collapse in 1995. For the first time in ten years, my Angels, who consistently lost 90-100 games a year, were flirting with the postseason.  On August 6th, the Angels had a 10 1/2 game lead on the Texas Rangers and an 11 1/2 game lead over the Mariners. But a nine game losing streak from August 22nd to September 3rd, and one from September 13th to September 23rd, found the Angels one time gargantuan lead whittled to a tie breaker game with the Mariners to decide who made the postseason. The Mariners ace Randy Johnson hurled a one run, three hit effort, obliterating us 9-1.

From 1987-2002, the Angels missed the postseason. So in order to find pride in things, I had to fall in love with the faces of their losing tradition. Each one of them, like me, was a stalwart ballplayer who played more for the love of the game than he did to experience a winner’s glory.

Remember Chili Davis,  the Angels starting left fielder from 88-90, 93-96? Davis enjoyed an eighteen year career that saw him quietly finish with 350 home runs, a .279 batting average, and 2,355 career hits. More known for the hilarity of his first name, Davis was a rock for the Angels clubhouse in the mid-90’s.

How about Luis Polonia, the 5-8  145 pound gremlin lead-off hitter from 90-93′? Most of Polonia’s thirteen year career was littered with injury. But from 90-93′, Polonia played in 90% of his games and celebrated a .297 batting average. He had the keen ability to slap the ball the other way, and steal bases to set up runs for the Angels big hitters.

Big hitters like the famous Kelly Gruber. Gruber’s forgettable ten year career was predominately played in Toronto, till he finished even more forgettably in 93′ with the Angels. He played eighteen games with three home runs and nine RBIs. Let’s just say Gruber is a favorite of mine when playing “name that random athlete.”

Or how about a big overweight piece of you know what in first baseman Mo Vaughn? Vaughn, the poor man’s Big Papi, signed a record size contract at the time–80 mill over six with Anaheim in 1999. The supposed savior for a franchise with no big names, struck out one hundred eighty times in 2000, and missed all of 2001 with a torn ankle ligament, after slipping in the dugout.

Gary DiSarcina played all eleven (’89-’00) of his big league years with the Angels.  A myriad of injuries created a sort of cult following for the hardworking DiSarcina, which was odd, considering he was only a lifetime .258 hitter. For much of my young life I believed DiSarcina was a near .300 hitter who had played in numerous all-star games.  It was not until last year, that the rose-colored glasses of Angel fandom were ripped from my eyes, showing me just how bad DiSarcina was for most of his career.

As we all know, you can’t win games without great pitching. Which was exactly what the Angels did not have. Besides Chuck Finley and Mark Langston, the Angels starting rotation mimicked that of a little league team. John Farrel, a true workhorse, always made me feel secure when he was on the mound. In 1993, the stud finished 3-12 with a 7.35 era.  It must of been the lack of run support for guys like Farrel or Kirk McCaskill (yeeeaaa riggghhhhhttt). McCaskill’s stunning performance in 1991 left quite a legacy for Angel pitching, finishing the season 10-19 with an amazing 1 to 1 strikeout to walk ratio.

On the eve of the 2002 season I made a bet with my father. I told him the Angels would make the playoffs for the first time in sixteen years. He took the bet and gave me three to one odds. As the season progressed and the Angels got better and better, my father found himself rooting for them as I did. He took a sense of pride in knowing that his son was the kind of man who had stuck it out with no-name failures. When the Angels wrapped up the wild card and a season of 99-63, my father and I reminisced on all the past Angel greats (or “not so greats”). We chuckled remembering Mark Langston’s high leg kick, and Devon White’s inability to hit a change up.

When the Angels shocked the world and won the World Series, I lamented a bit in the celebration. I now had an expectation that they would win year in year out.  No longer could I use their losing as an excuse for my languished faith or diligent grit. “Welcome to the big leagues,” my father said jokingly, during the World Series celebration. Slapping a hundred in my hand (original bet was thirty bucks, which means with my win he owed me ninety), he continued, “take the extra ten dollars as a tip for being so damn faithful all these years.”

As the 2011 season fast approaches, I am unamused or concerned with our 80-82 campaign in 2010. For many of the new era fans, the people who hopped on after our 2002 World Series, winning is everything. From 2002 to present the Angels have developed into a perennial power with five division titles and six playoff births. But winning is just a speck in the eye of my love for Angel baseball, and does not deter me from celebrating a lifetime of appreciation for players who paved the way for our recent string of success. My love for the unexpected is far stronger than a insecure need to be crowned champ every year.

In fact, with all this winning I am beginning to get a bit uncomfortable. Which is why the Kansas City Royals are sounding pretty damn good right now.

]]>
http://www.fansmanship.com/a-fringe-fan-muses/feed/ 1